![]() FLA is still the undisputed king of crimson and still has that obnoxious sustain, albeit it now has to be used with some level of care unlike before.Ĭonsidering his perks, allowing him to plaster the mid-rank with those horrendous bleeds is still a bit much, even if you did it with Exanguinate despite its HP restriction. I was planning on initially posting something like this in the Feedback forum as a suggestion to Red Hook, but I wanted to get some input (and criticism) from the community on this, to hash it out and make sure there's sense and an argument to be made in it's favor. I personally think it could be best to have Punish hitting 2 & 3, but it's just an idea. ![]() Rain of Sorrows would still be ranks 3 & 4. My suggestion would be to change either Exsanguinate or Punish (but not both) to hit ranks 2 & 3 only (not 1) and have the other remain for rank 1 & 2. Now that I'm playing around with the FLAG some more I feel like there was a portional mistake there. Pre Nerf, I argued mildly that one way to increase the viability of Rain of Sorrows was to increase the damage (or reduce the reduction of damage) as well as drop rank 3 from Punish' available targets. Initially they had Punish as a be all end all move that could hit ranks 1, 2, & 3, with Exsanguinate hitting ranks 1 & 2 and Rain of Sorrows doing next to no damage ( - 90% dmg I think?), while carrying the standard debuff to bleed resist and doing a decent Bleed DoT. Overall I generally like the changes made, so it's been a little hard to decide what the issue is. After the Flagellant was nerfed (and not without reason) I've found myself not caring about or even wanting to run them.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |